Since it was requested, here you go.

Aye. tis best to put the rules so people can't whine and say they didn't know.

Proxy wrote:Aye. tis best to put the rules so people can't whine and say they didn't know.

LOL with my rules, i had people sign that they read and understood all the rules and commands... and i still got people trying to use commands that didn't exist and banned commands way too often...

people are idiots... they don't listen to common sense and the moment they get power, they will think "hum.. how can i recklesly use this power to crush other human beings?"

no argument there Misho but none the less they can't say Well you didn't say that was the rules and everything is unfair ... let me cry about it some more before I go and whine to all the people on bnet how ZDC and the sister clans are unfair.etc

I agree with Misho. Don't expect that writing it down will help at all, but at least it's a nice gesture.

The point I would like to make is that is that a few people are keeping their admin because the rules are "spelled" out. This may seem "unfair" but if I spell out the rules to the letter I will enforce them to the letter.

I dont mind whichever you do. The only thing i have done in unban Dargo then talk with you and kick about 10 people that cause the bot to run slow. Other then that its all clean for me. (oh yah and a couple swaps to make sure im red on my special map )

Thank me for asking him

Mr.Excitement wrote:Thank me for asking him

O rly? That completly ruins everything cant you just base it off common sense and decide what is abuse or not?

Honestly I couldn't care less whether you put rules up. Will it help? no most likely not. But then again if you had admins that could follow the rules we wouldn't be having this discussion would we?

nice burn but in all aspect any other hosters for any other servers or players for that matter if they prove to be an asset to ZDC and other clans on and off the boards, should be allowed to have access rights to the host bot such as kicking out of the pregame lobby against spammers, racists, abusers etc.
but for such things as a ban list, i would leave that to the bots owner in my opinion, send a screen shot to a banlist thread showing whats happened with a /whois of the player to show its not a spoof for people egoing against an innocent player and leave it for the owner to decide, as the saying goes were all pawns in the game of life

Screenshots can be photoshoped as misho says so gimli might be looking for a replay. All in the end its common sense

So far the majority disagrees, Army.

It doesnt matter this would of never came up if you didnt ask.... just use common sense

Well so far this poll shows me that alot of people were thinking what Mr.Excitement asked, they just didn't want to ask or had reasons not to. *wink*

Well most could careless if they were written down or not. It was based off common sense before and thats the way it should be. A bunch of stuff is happening now because of that question...

If only more people thought like you, right?
I'm not going to bother arguing over a set of rules for an internet game, because it really is not srs bizniz.

only 11 people have voted, was hoping for more participation

half the people that play on your bot are not even on the forum gimli..... and most dont care

well i hope this is the right place to reply. i think Gimli should have the say so in regards to the rules. hes got good head on his shoulders

looks like the poll just ended with 10 saying yes and 5 saying no. That works for me, I will post the rules asap.

Since the poll is over Gimli you should probably take down your advertising for it.

lol, whoops. done.

If you are wondering why you don't have admin you need to sign the Admin Agreement page here.

If you signed the page and still don't have admin it's most likely cause you didn't sign the page right, not because i haven't checked it because i do check it daily.